| bilabial | dental | alveolar | postalveolar | retroflex | palatal | velar | glottal | |
| stop | pʰ, p | t̪ʰ, t̪ | ʈʰ, ʈ | kʰ, k | ʔ | |||
| tap | ɾ | |||||||
| fricative | s | ʃ | ʂ | h | ||||
| affricate | tsʰ, ts | tʃʰ, tʃ | ||||||
| nasal | m | n | ɲ | ŋ | ||||
| approximant | j | |||||||
| lateral approximant | l |
| bilabial | velar | |
| stop | pʰʷ, pʷ | kʰʷ, kʷ |
| nasal | mʷ | ŋʷ |
| front | back | |
| close | i | u |
| close-mid | e | o |
| open-mid | ʌ | |
| open | ɑ |
| front | back | |
| close | ĩ | ũ |
| close-mid | ẽ | õ |
| open | ɑ̃ |
42, 52, 44, 22
Cj/l/ɾ
m, n, ŋ, ɾ, l, p, k, ʔ
(C)(j/l/ɾ)V(C)
Source: Hildebrandt, Kristine A. 2003. Manange Tone: Scenarios of Retention and Loss in Two Communities. UC Santa-Barbara; Hildebrandt, Kristine A. 2004. A grammar and glossary of the Manange language. Tibeto-Burman languages of Nepal: Manange and Sherpa, ed. by Carol Genetti, 1–189. Pacific linguistics 557. Canberra: The Australian National University; Hildebrandt, Kristine A. 2005. A Phonetic Analysis of Manange Segmental and Suprasegmental Properties. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 28.1–36.
Comments: Based on my field data, /kj/ clusters seem in reality to be palatalised segments (/kʲ/). A re-evalution is in order.
Contributed by: Dmitry Nikolaev (dnikolaev@fastmail.com)