bilabial | alveolar | postalveolar | palatal | velar | pharyngeal | |
stop | p, b | t, d | k, g | |||
trill | r | |||||
fricative | β̞ | s̠ | ħ | |||
affricate | tʃ, dʒ | |||||
nasal | m | n | ɲ | ŋ | ||
approximant | j | |||||
lateral approximant | l |
front | central | back | |
close | i | u | |
close-mid | e | o | |
open | a |
front | central | back | |
close | iː | uː | |
close-mid | eː | oː | |
open | aː |
front | back | |
close | iˤ | uˤ |
close-mid | oˤ |
front | back | |
close | iˤː | uˤː |
close-mid | oˤː |
/ie/, /iˤæ/
(C)V(C)
Source: Новикова, Клавдия Александровна. 1960. Очерки диалектов эвенского языка. Часть 1: ольский говор. Москва; Ленинград: Издательство АН СССР; Aralova, Natalia. 2015. Vowel harmony in two Even dialects: Production and perception. Ph.D. thesis. University of Amsterdam.
Comments: The system is presented according to the interpretation in Aralova 2015. /ħ/ and /s̠/ are in complementary distribution (/ħ/ only word initially). /oː/ ‘is slightly diphthongoid and starts with a short [u]’ (p. 30). Vowel harmony is root based and governs the distribution of consonant allophones: ‘According to Novikova (1960), the vowel inventory is divided into two groups of vowels opposed by pharyngealization, namely the non-pharyngealized set /e eː i iː o oː u uː ie/ vs. the pharyngealized set /a aː ị ịː ọ ọː ụ ụː ịa/. <...> Novikova (1960: 74) notes a common tendency for all consonants to be retracted in the context of set 2 vowels. According to her, within a word containing set 2 vowels, labials become nasalized, dental stops get secondary dorsal articulation, and the velar voiceless stop becomes uvular. <...> The lateral approximant has a palatalized variant within the context of set 1 vowels and a velarized variant within the context of set 2 vowels.’ (p. 38–39)
Contributed by: Dmitry Nikolaev (dnikolaev@fastmail.com)